Mar 15, 2007, 06:08 PM // 18:08
|
#2
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Home...
Guild: Vier Reiter [Vier]
|
All Gwen things are pure speculation. They have never confirmed or denied any of it really. Personally, I like the urban myth-like quality about it. I have a Gwen collection with everything thus far. It's fun. May never be useful. Still fun, I love the lil' pyro. The removal of the tattered cape was months ago. They haven't explained it yet, doubt they will now.
|
|
|
Mar 15, 2007, 06:08 PM // 18:08
|
#3
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Maryland
Guild: Mage Elites [MAGE]
|
I'm sure its gone because its useless. Dont bother.
Last edited by Kool Pajamas; Mar 15, 2007 at 06:19 PM // 18:19..
|
|
|
Mar 15, 2007, 06:11 PM // 18:11
|
#4
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Carolina, US
Guild: The Arctic Marauders [TAM]
Profession: W/
|
Reference to deleted post removed.
He is saying that the capes are probably useless or will be used later in a quest and given at that time.
On topic, I never really got into the whole gwen speculation thing so I always thought they were a waste of inventory space.
Last edited by Mercury Angel; Mar 15, 2007 at 07:12 PM // 19:12..
|
|
|
Mar 15, 2007, 06:13 PM // 18:13
|
#5
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Europe
Guild: The German Order [GER]
Profession: N/
|
Well, removal of it was pretty much pointless waste of developer time if you ask me ... just like removal Mignas the Meek.
If it aint bugged/inbalanced don't fix it ...
|
|
|
Mar 15, 2007, 06:16 PM // 18:16
|
#6
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
|
Reference to deleted post removed.
The only reason I was going to buy one is because that's the only option I have right now. I just didn't want to miss out on something cool in the future if they put a Gwen quest in. However, now I just have a feeling they took it out because it's useless... in which case I won't bother... and was interested in seeing what other people were thinking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mourne
I think my question is, did you even read his post?
|
Thanks for the support... the same thing was on my mind when I read it.
Last edited by Mercury Angel; Mar 15, 2007 at 07:13 PM // 19:13..
|
|
|
Mar 15, 2007, 07:04 PM // 19:04
|
#7
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Inside
Guild: Fifteen Over Fifty [Rare]
|
To the OP: Both options #1 and #2 are correct....however, it's just cool to have one, even if it serves no point.
Your storage slots are yours alone, use them as you see fit.
|
|
|
Mar 15, 2007, 08:35 PM // 20:35
|
#8
|
Raged Out
|
they removed it to stop speculation because Gwen is dead, in fact there neevr was a Gwen. You are all imagining things.
|
|
|
Mar 15, 2007, 08:41 PM // 20:41
|
#9
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Jun 2006
Guild: OoT
Profession: W/Mo
|
OK................
How much you buying for 1? I have 16, 8 quest item ones......and 8 salavage ones
|
|
|
Mar 15, 2007, 08:42 PM // 20:42
|
#10
|
Krytan Explorer
|
I'd be inclined to keep it or get one myself. Even though it may not relate to a specific quest it could always unlock some kind of harmless easter egg or joke for long term players.
|
|
|
Mar 15, 2007, 09:04 PM // 21:04
|
#11
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Minnesota
Guild: Onslaught of Xen [XoO]
Profession: R/
|
I'm sure they would not make it so that you would have to have one non-obtainable item to do a quest.
|
|
|
Mar 15, 2007, 09:52 PM // 21:52
|
#12
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In the Elfen Forests of Washington State
Guild: Damage Radius
Profession: N/
|
Like the golden box in the desert and the collector who makes bricks that you can't get the items for, loose ends with no real purpose...
|
|
|
Mar 16, 2007, 02:17 AM // 02:17
|
#13
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: May 2005
Profession: R/
|
I held onto Gwen's stuff for a long, long time, but I finally deleted them because I needed the storage space -- wish there was space to hold fun stuff like that.
|
|
|
Mar 16, 2007, 08:51 AM // 08:51
|
#14
|
Krytan Explorer
|
Let's hope they do better with the next trilogy....
|
|
|
Mar 16, 2007, 10:16 AM // 10:16
|
#15
|
Krytan Explorer
|
It's just junk.
|
|
|
Mar 16, 2007, 11:16 AM // 11:16
|
#16
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Guildmistress Eve [Me], Guildmistress Azura [N], Guildmistress Azumi [A], Guildmistress Jaina [D]
Guild: Guildmaster Aeron [Rt], Arthas Ironfist [W], Guild: The Tyrian Templars [TTT]
|
I dont think it is possible for a company to scheme this all way up ahead. At the creation of CH1, they might have had vague ideas about the following chapters. Maybe GW:P would have been a mistake and they shouldnt continue the story, it would have been stupid to use money to develop the story for a sequel 2 years later. No, you start writing the sequel at the moment you think it will pay off. All stuff lying around, being loose ends to quests, will remain loose ends for a long while. And I support your idea, that Anet will not screw his players by saying suddenly: ah 2 bad for u spanky, you should have kept that item for 2 years to show ur dedication to our game. Now u cant do that leet quest with the leet rewards.
|
|
|
Mar 16, 2007, 02:16 PM // 14:16
|
#17
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nottingham, England
Guild: The Venerable Truth [TvT] The Venerable Alliance [TvH] [TvL]
Profession: R/
|
Out of interest i wonder how much people would sell them at?
|
|
|
Mar 16, 2007, 11:03 PM // 23:03
|
#18
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Sep 2005
Guild: Tyrian Explorers League
Profession: R/P
|
If they did remove it, it was because it was an item with no current or planned use. They're not going to make an item drop for a limited time, remove it, and then make it required for something some months down the road.
Now the Tapestry Shard and the Broken Flute, all bets are still off on
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:04 PM // 21:04.
|